Legal Opinion
Bradford v. Moench
District Court, D. Utah
Decided October 26, 1992No. 87-C-0078-SPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAM, District Judge.
The court has before it the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge dated February 25, 1992. There was no timely objection to the Report and Recommendation, other than that filed by the Moench defendants, who have since been dismissed from the case. 1
The court, having reviewed the matter de novo, concurs with the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Report and Recommendation contains alternate recommendations with respect to plaintiffs’ 12(1) claim. For purposes of this case, the court adopts the magistrate judge’s alternate recommendation…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- P. Stolz Family Partnership L.P. v. DaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Stephenson v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Griffin v. PaineWebber Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Todd v. DSN Dealer Service Network, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Todd v. RichmondDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.