Board of Supervisors v. Board of Supervisors
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Iosco; Connine, J. Assumpsit by the board of supervisors of Arenac county against the board of supervisors of Iosco county for money paid for the care of an indigent smallpox patient. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The following extract from the opinion of the circuit judge states the nature of the case and the question presented:
“ This is an action of assumpsit. Declaration on the common counts, alleging the promise to pay ‘ in compliance with section 4424 of the Complied Laws of 1897.’ A notice is annexed to the declaration to the effect that plaintiff, under the money counts, would give in evidence 17 certain bills, audited and allowed and paid by plaintiff in a certain smallpox quarantine case of "William M. Gregory; said Gregory or his parents or any other person not being able to pay the same, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Elliott v. Kalkaska SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Cicotte v. County of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Endriss v. County of ChippewaMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Weston v. County of LuceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Auditor General v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Board of Supervisors v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Attorney General v. BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Potter v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Potter v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973