Weston v. County of Luce
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Luce. (Steere, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
Defendant demurred to the declaration filed in this case, which is .based upon the claim for money paid to the county treasurer under protest. The action is brought against the county. The declaration alleges, in substance, that the taxes were levied upon the plaintiff’s land, which was' returned for non-payment; that the plaintiff thereafter found an opportunity to sell the land, but as the certificate of the county treasurer, required by section 135 of the tax law of 1893, could not be obtained without paying these taxes, he paid them to the treasurer under protest; that he was obliged to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Comm'rs of Wabaunsee Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- City of Detroit v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- State ex rel. McCardy v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Cicotte v. County of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCurdy v. County of ShiawasseeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Thompson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Applebaum v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railroad v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Board of Supervisors v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.