Legal Opinion

Auditor General v. Board of Supervisors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Mandamus by Stanley W. Turner, Auditor General, against the board of supervisors of Bay county and William V. Prybesld, county treasurer, to compel respondents to collect and pay to the State an amount alleged to be due to the State from the county.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The relator seeks to compel the officers of Bay county to collect and pay to the State upwards of $100,000, which he claims to be due to the State from said county. He professes to claim only sums which have been collected by said county since December 31, 1884, alleging that at that date said county had overpaid the State, and that the State soon after paid to said county the sum of $95, in full of the balance due to the county. The county admits this payment, but alleges that at the time it was made the State was indebted to the county for a large amount, which it had paid, and the State…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Mayor of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Aplin v. Van TasselMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Keyes v. SherwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Auditor General v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Stevens v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. French Republic v. Inland Nav. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920
  2. State ex rel. Young v. HolgateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Board of Supervisors v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Sleight v. RoeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Harding v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API