Cozad v. Raisch Improvement Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Guy Le Roy Stevick, Alfred C. Skaife, W. E. Cowan, L. A. Redman, and Jewel Alexander, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
The plaintiff, D. W. Cozad, was at the time of the accident employed by the Raisch Improvement Company in paving a street in the city of Vallejo. He was foreman of a grading gang part of whose work consisted in the building of a curb line of concrete on the north side of the street. In connection with the work, a concrete mixing machine was used into which crushed rock and cement were conveyed by means of a “skip” or “conveyer” operated by a gasoline…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Viou v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Rinklin v. AckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- McGraw v. Friend & Terry Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Duffy v. Hobbs, Wall & Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Causey v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- McCullough v. LangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Faris v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Girard v. IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.