Mitchell v. Trustees of United States Mutual Real Estate Investment Trust
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P.J.
This action involves a $77,600 non-purchase-money "wraparound” mortgage note made by plaintiffs Mitchell and payable to defendant United States Mutual Real Estate Investment Trust with interest of 11%. The circuit court held that Michigan’s usury statutes had been preempted by federal legislation so that the note was not usurious as a matter of law. We reverse.
On August 21, 1978, plaintiffs borrowed $65,200 from the Bank of Lansing for the construction and purchase of a home. Interest was set at 10%. Under the terms of a 30-year promissory note, payments of $572.46 were to be made monthly.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Aiken v. ObledoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1977
- American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. OrensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Fort Pitt Malleable Iron Co. v. Detroit Steel Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Prince George's County v. McMahonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
3Cited by14 opinions
- Russell v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Imperial Hotels Corporation v. Arthur P. Dore Jay Ambe Corporation and Dore Development Company, Mainstream Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Pacific Mortgage and Investment Group, Ltd. v. HornCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Stuchin v. KasirerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.