Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Trustees of United States Mutual Real Estate Investment Trust

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1985No. Docket 79225PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P.J.

This action involves a $77,600 non-purchase-money "wraparound” mortgage note made by plaintiffs Mitchell and payable to defendant United States Mutual Real Estate Investment Trust with interest of 11%. The circuit court held that Michigan’s usury statutes had been preempted by federal legislation so that the note was not usurious as a matter of law. We reverse.

On August 21, 1978, plaintiffs borrowed $65,200 from the Bank of Lansing for the construction and purchase of a home. Interest was set at 10%. Under the terms of a 30-year promissory note, payments of $572.46 were to be made monthly.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Aiken v. ObledoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1977
  3. American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. OrensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Fort Pitt Malleable Iron Co. v. Detroit Steel Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Prince George's County v. McMahonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Russell v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Imperial Hotels Corporation v. Arthur P. Dore Jay Ambe Corporation and Dore Development Company, Mainstream Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Pacific Mortgage and Investment Group, Ltd. v. HornCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Stuchin v. KasirerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API