Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Muskegon, Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1903No. Docket No. 154PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Bussell, J. Ejectment by Lucie S. Wilson against the Muskegon, Grand Bapids & Indiana Bailroad Company and the Grand Bapids & Indiana Bailway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

There are two questions raised by the briefs of counsel: (1) Whether the plaintiff proved a prima facie title to the premises in dispute; and (2) whether the statute under, which the defendant’s railroad was located justifies us in holding that it acquired a legal estate or right of possession under an executory contract for the sale of land.

Bach party claims title from Dennis Smith, plaintiff by deed, and defendant under a writing which reads as follows:

“In consideration of the sum of one dollar to me in hand paid, and of other valuable considerations to me moving, I hereby agree to convey,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moran v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. MarbleMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Harrett v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Greenwood v. School District No. 4Michigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kirchen v. RemengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McVannel v. Pure Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Bruun v. HansenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Bonninghausen v. HansenMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bentley v. CamMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API