Legal Opinion

Bruun v. Hansen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1937No. Docket No. 128, Calendar No. 39,445PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff brought ejectment against defendants to recover possession of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section 21, town 29 north, range 2 west, in the county of Otsego, Michigan. He relied upon a homestead tax land deed from the State of Michigan to T. E. Douglas Company. There was judgment for defendants and plaintiff appeals.

Most of the questions herein are governed by Bruun v. Cook, 280 Mich. 484.

Defendants contend plaintiff is estopped from asserting title. Title to land may not rest on estoppel. Nowlin Lumber Co. v. Wilson, 119 Mich. 406; Huyck v. Bailey, 100 Mich.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McVannel v. Pure Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Nowlin Lumber Co. v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Bruun v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Lushington v. Seattle Auto & Driving ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Corrigan v. HinkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tropic Builders, Ltd. v. Naval Ammunition Depot Lualualei Quarters, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Stone v. CulverMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Andre v. FinkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Chilton's, Inc. v. Wilmington Apartment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Daniels v. DanielMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API