Legal Opinion
Herman v. Will Township
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 3, 1996No. 3-96-0017PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCUSKEY
The defendant, Will Township (Township), appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Vincent Herman. A jury awarded the plaintiff damages for injuries he suffered in an accident on a gravel road that had recently been improved by the Township.
On appeal, the Township first argues that the judgment should be reversed. The Township contends that it was immune from liability pursuant to sections 2 — 109, 2 — 201 and 3 — 103(a) of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Tort Immunity Act) (745 ILCS 10/2 — 109, 2 — 201, 3 — 103(a) (West 1994)). In the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- West v. KirkhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Snyder v. Curran TownshipIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Wagner v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Taylor v. KohliIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Ross v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bachman v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Schuler v. Mid-Central CardiologyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Wrobel v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- D.M. v. National School Bus Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Barnhisel v. Village of Oak ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.