Legal Opinion

Ross v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 11, 1988No. 87—0389, 87—0509 consPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE LORENZ

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs Janice Ross (Ross) and Virginia Clements (Clements), in a consolidated action, filed separate complaints against defendants Ford Motor Company and the City of Chicago (City) following the deaths of plaintiffs’ decedents in an automobile collision. Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal below, as to defendant City, of both complaints under section 2 — 615 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 2 — 615) pursuant to a finding by the trial court under Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (107 Ill. 2d R. 304(a)).

On…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Curtis v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Johnston v. City of East MolineIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Baran v. City of Chicago HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Janssen v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Horrell v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Mt. Zion State Bank & Trust v. Consolidated Communications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. West v. KirkhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. DiBenedetto v. Flora TownshipIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Wood v. Village of GrayslakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Newsome v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API