Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Kohli

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1994No. 76436PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

In this case of first impression, we are asked to resolve two questions: first, whether an expert is an agent of the party hiring him; second, whether and when a missing-witness instruction is appropriate if a disclosed expert is not called.

Plaintiff was admitted to defendant’s hospital for treatment of a condition related to dropfoot. Defendant doctor examined plaintiff and concluded that surgery was necessary. Defendant performed the surgery, after which plaintiff suffered a complication, the nature and cause of which were in dispute. Plaintiff was treated for the complication and released.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schaffner v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Opp v. PryorIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Sears v. RutishauserIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Trower v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Bargman v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Chemtool, Inc. v. Lubrication Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Clarendon National Insurance v. MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Greaney v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Kaporovskiy v. Grecian Delight Foods, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Adami v. BelmonteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API