Taylor v. Kohli
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple
In this case of first impression, we are asked to resolve two questions: first, whether an expert is an agent of the party hiring him; second, whether and when a missing-witness instruction is appropriate if a disclosed expert is not called.
Plaintiff was admitted to defendant’s hospital for treatment of a condition related to dropfoot. Defendant doctor examined plaintiff and concluded that surgery was necessary. Defendant performed the surgery, after which plaintiff suffered a complication, the nature and cause of which were in dispute. Plaintiff was treated for the complication and released.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schaffner v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Opp v. PryorIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Sears v. RutishauserIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Trower v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Bargman v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Chemtool, Inc. v. Lubrication Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Clarendon National Insurance v. MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Greaney v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Kaporovskiy v. Grecian Delight Foods, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Adami v. BelmonteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.