Bayley v. Denny
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from tlie Fifteenth. Judicial District Court, parish of Assumption. Beattie, J.
1Opinion of the CourtWyly, J.
In 1867 R. H. Bayley, whose succession is represented by the plaintiff, purchased at sheriff’s sale under the judgment in the case of Domas v. Seymour, the undivided half of a sugar plantation in the parish of Assumption, together with certain movable property thereon, and he leased the same to the defendant, David Denny, till the thirty-first December, 1870, for the price of $700 per annum. The other half of the plantation belonged to R. L. Pugh, the brother-in-law of Denny. Denny and Pugh lived on the plantation and cultivated it in partnership. The sugar house on the plantation had been…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ellis v. PrevostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Wallace & Co. v. HartySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bonvillain v. BodenheimerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Lewis v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Culver v. CulverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Kuhn v. BreardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Bagley v. Rose Hill Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.