Legal Opinion
Keller v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 1932No. Docket No. 8255PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs brought this action to have declared void the assessment based upon benefits received by the land under an ordinance of the City of Los Angeles, opening an alley between Flower and Figueroa Streets, and extending from Eighth Street to within 170 feet of Seventh Street, and to restrain defendants from proceeding further with the said assessment, and to recover from defendants the portion of said assessment paid by plaintiffs under protest, as shall be found unlawfully assessed against them.
Demurrers were sustained to the complaint, the amended complaint and the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Davies v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jeffery v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Auburn Lumber Co. v. City of AuburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Auburn Lumber Co. v. City of AuburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Brissel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936