Page v. Mintzer
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant property owners appeal from a judgment foreclosing the lien of a street assessment in the city of Richmond. The only question is as to the validity of certain acts performed by the assistant superintendent of streets.
There is no question regarding the proceedings by which the city council acquired jurisdiction to order the work to be done. Upon proper advertisement the plaintiff's bid for the work was properly accepted. It is not suggested that the work was not well done, within reasonable time, in entire accord with the specifications, and for the agreed price. There is no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Nofire v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Oakland Paving Co. v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Hooper v. GoodwinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1861
- Farley v. ReindollarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Sisson v. KalkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929