Legal Opinion

Merriam v. Huselton

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1930No. 8818PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, District Judge.

This is an action brought by Howard E. Huselton, plaintiff, against A. E. Merriam, defendant, to recover damages for wrongful and malicious attachment. A jury was waived and the cause tried to the court, and a general finding in favor of the plaintiff was made with judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $4,460. From that judgment the defendant appeals, bottoming the appeal upon the refusal of the trial court to declare six separately numbered propositions of law.

From the record it appears that the controversy originated over the assignment by appelke, Huselton,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  3. McPherson v. Cement Gun Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Inter-Southern Life Ins. v. KlaberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API