Commonwealth v. Murray
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Musmanno,
This case has to do with wire tapping and telephone extension listening.
John Murray, the defendant, who had been employed by a Philadelphia firm, Lanston Monotype, Inc., left that firm to take a job with Summit Industries in Aspers, Adams County. One day Murray called Donald C. Haas, an employee of the Lanston firm, and asked him to obtain from Lanston some certain prints of a “perforating machine,” for which Murray would .pay Haas $25. Haas reported this conversation to his superiors and then the Lanston firm employed E. J. Charters Associates, private…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. PolakoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Commonwealth v. TaubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
3Cited by63 opinions
- Pennsylvania State EduCation Ass'n ex rel. Wilson v. Commonwealth, Department of Community & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Marks v. Bell Tel. Co. of Penn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HassineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. GullettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.