United States v. Polakoff
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The chief question on this appeal is the-competency of the accused’s declarations, made by telephone to the prosecution’s chief witness, Kafton. The indictment was for conspiring to obstruct justice (§ 241, Title 18 U.S.Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 241) by influencing an assistant district attorney in his recommendation, of sentence to-the district judge. The case for the prosecution was in substance - as follows., Kafton had himself been indicted for deal--*889ing in narcotics, and the accused, Polakoff and Albert, agreed that if he would plead guilty and would pay them a sum of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Crapo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Goldstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Billeci v. United States. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.