Legal Opinion

United States v. Polakoff

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 10, 1940No. 329PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The chief question on this appeal is the-competency of the accused’s declarations, made by telephone to the prosecution’s chief witness, Kafton. The indictment was for conspiring to obstruct justice (§ 241, Title 18 U.S.Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 241) by influencing an assistant district attorney in his recommendation, of sentence to-the district judge. The case for the prosecution was in substance - as follows., Kafton had himself been indicted for deal--*889ing in narcotics, and the accused, Polakoff and Albert, agreed that if he would plead guilty and would pay them a sum of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Crapo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. Goldstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Billeci v. United States. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API