Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Rainbolt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1952No. 35043PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error (plaintiff below and so referred to hereafter) filed her petition on June 5, 1950, against defendants in error (hereafter referred to as defendants).

She alleged that “she is and was on June 5, 1950, the occupant of” lot 20, in block 39, city of New Cordell, Oklahoma, in Washita county. Plaintiff pleaded no title or ownership and she claimed no title in the court below, and claims none here. Her only claim is that of an “occupant”. She alleges that on said date the defendants entered upon said premises occupied by plaintiff and forcibly, maliciously and willfully, and after…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Oklahoma City v. Hill Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  2. Reed v. PriceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  3. Banks v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Smith v. SchlinkColorado Court of Appeals · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grubbs v. BailesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Allen v. HickmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. People v. Priscilla JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Farmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Stahl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API