Garber v. Hauser
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County ; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by Adolph Hauser and wife against B. A. Garber and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This controversy arose by Hauser and his wife bringing suit against B. A. Garber et al., to cancel an oil and gas lease on one hundred and sixty acres of land located in Garfield county. At the time of bringing suit, the lease was owned by J. R. Swank and J. E. Burke. The oil and gas lease was dated January 4, 1916, and is what is commonly referred to as Producers Form 88. The grounds for setting aside the lease, as alleged in the petition, were, in substance:
First: That Hauser was sick at the time of executing the lease, and Garber represented he was going to get up a block of leases and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Northwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. BranineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Dyal v. NortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Southard v. Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3Cited by13 opinions
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Fast v. GilbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Probert v. CaswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- OKLAHOMA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INS. CO. v. TyraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Fitzsimmons v. TrosperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.