First National Bank v. Guerra
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the defendants, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of the County of Ventura. Hines, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court:
Judgment and order reversed, for the reasons stated in the opinion heretofore filed herein by Department One.
The following is the opinion of Department One, together with the dissenting opinion of McKee, J.:
The Court :
The plaintiffs are entitled to recover possession of the premises in controversy, unless the homestead claim of the defendant, Concepcion de la Guerra, is a valid one, or unless the adverse possession which the Court below found she has held of the premises constitutes a bar to such recovery.
The premises, which are known as the Cañada de Tapo, form a part of the Simi…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Kachigian v. KachigianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Union Oil Co. v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Mauldin v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Schoonover v. BirnbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.