Schoonover v. Birnbaum
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant was the owner of an undivided one-half interest in a lot in Santa Barbara, which, in the year 1897, she selected as a 'homestead, by declaration to that effect duly executed and recorded. Subsequently she was adjudged a bankrupt under the provisions of the Bankruptcy Law of the United States, and the plaintiff was duly appointed as trustee in bankruptcy of her estate. The suit was instituted by the plaintiff to declare the so-called homestead invalid, and is based solely upon the ground that under the laws of this state a valid homestead cannot be selected or created upon land…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wolf v. FleischackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- In re the Estate of DorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Smith v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Vassault v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Rosenthal v. Merced BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Swan v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Watson v. PeytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Kachigian v. KachigianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.