Mauldin v. Cox
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Action of ejectment to recover a tract of land in Sacramento County. The cause was tried before a jury, verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendants moved for a new trial which was denied, and the cause comes upon appeal from final judgment and order overruling motion for new trial.
The facts necessary to a determination of the questions involved are as follows: —
In 1852 plaintiff, then a married woman and the wife of B. F. Mauldin, settled with her husband upon the land in question, where they continued to reside with their family until 1867, On the 31st day of August, 1860, a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- First National Bank v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Kapp v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Nielsen v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Union Oil Co. v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- McDonald v. FoxNevada Supreme Court · 1889
- Sexton v. SutherlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.