Legal Opinion
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 8, 2006No. 05cv0287 RWTPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TITUS, District Judge.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) brings this action to challenge certain conduct of Lockheed Martin Corporation in the wake of its merger with COMSAT Corporation in 2000. The action involves two unrelated sets of claims, only one of which is at issue in the instant motions. At issue are claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Equal Pay Act of 1963, the Fair Labor Standards Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, alleging that Lockheed unlawfully retaliated…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reed v. Airtran AirwaysDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Propp v. Counterpart InternationalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Royster v. GahlerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Nucletron Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.