Legal Opinion

Gump v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 2000No. 21670PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAYAMA, J.

Petitioner-appellant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart) has applied to this court for a writ of certiorari to review the opinion of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) in Gump v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 93 Hawai'i 428, 5 P.3d 418 (App.1999) [hereinafter, the “ICA’s opinion”], affirming the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiff and various orders of the trial court. Wal-Mart argues that the ICA erred in affirming the judgment and orders because: 1) the ICA should not have adopted the “mode of. operation” rule; 2) the ICA misapplied the rule by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Petersen Ex Rel. Petersen v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Mitchell v. BranchHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Tamashiro v. De GamaHawaii Supreme Court · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Owens v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Sheehan v. Roche Bros. Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Maans v. Giant of Maryland, L.L.C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API