Tamashiro v. De Gama
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
RICHARDSON, C.J.
Plaintiffs, Shunsei and Kiyoko Tamashiro, sued defendant De Gama for injuries suffered in an automobile collision between vehicles operated by defendant and plaintiffs’ minor, unemancipated son. Pursuant to R.L.H. 1955, § 246-16, 1 De Gama joined the minor Tamashiro as a third-party defendant. On third-party defendant’s motion, the trial court dismissed the third-party complaint on the ground that defendant was not entitled to contribution from the minor son for injuries sustained by the plaintiffs. From this order defendant appeals.
The question…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gelbman v. GelbmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Balts v. BaltsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- PULLER (Et Al.) v. PullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Zarrella v. MillerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Petersen Ex Rel. Petersen v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- France v. A. P. A. Transport Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Lee v. ComerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.