Legal Opinion

Tamashiro v. De Gama

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1969No. 4732PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

Plaintiffs, Shunsei and Kiyoko Tamashiro, sued defendant De Gama for injuries suffered in an automobile collision between vehicles operated by defendant and plaintiffs’ minor, unemancipated son. Pursuant to R.L.H. 1955, § 246-16, 1 De Gama joined the minor Tamashiro as a third-party defendant. On third-party defendant’s motion, the trial court dismissed the third-party complaint on the ground that defendant was not entitled to contribution from the minor son for injuries sustained by the plaintiffs. From this order defendant appeals.

The question…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gelbman v. GelbmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Balts v. BaltsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. PULLER (Et Al.) v. PullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Zarrella v. MillerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
  5. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Petersen Ex Rel. Petersen v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  4. France v. A. P. A. Transport Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  5. Lee v. ComerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API