Legal Opinion

Lanahan v. Myers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1964No. 40270PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Vice Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs; Buford W. Myers and Bertha Myers, his wife, commenced this action for damages against F. P. Lanahan, defendant. The parties will be referred to by their trial court designations. Plaintiffs, owners of land, alleged that defendant, oil and gas lessee, negligently operated oil wells, used more of the surface than was reasonably needed and allowed oil and salt water to run over the surface. The petition set forth three causes of action. At the trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $750 on the first cause of action for damage to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. GearSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Schlegel v. KinzieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Davon Oil Co. v. SteeleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Grenard v. PortsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Houck v. Hold Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Sanford v. Arjay Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Tenneco Oil Company v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Briscoe v. Harper Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Briscoe v. Harper Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API