Legal Opinion

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Howard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 1938No. 25785PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment in an action for damages to land and livestock alleged to have resulted from the escape of salt water and oil from oil wells operated by defendant and located upon land owned by plaintiff. Plaintiff owned 280 acres of land, but the oil wells here involved were located upon a 40-aere tract adjoining the main body of plaintiff’s land. Damage to this particular 40 acres only is claimed.

The xietition is in two counts. The first count is for damages to the land. In the second count plaintiff claimed damage because of the loss of two of her cows, which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tidal Oil Co. v. PeaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Marland Oil Co. v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Pure Oil Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Thomas v. MathisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Peters Petroleum Corp. v. AlredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. GearSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Davon Drilling Company v. GinderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Sanford v. Arjay Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Pitzer & West v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Cities Service Oil Company v. DacusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API