Legal Opinion · Dissent

Briscoe v. Harper Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 1985No. 57780Published

1DissentSummers, Justice

The instructions contained a preliminary-statement of the issues as follows:

“1. The amount of damages to Plaintiffs’ growing crops, including grasses, resulting from Defendant’s drilling operations, not to exceed $2,000, the amount sued for.

2. Whether or not the Defendant’s drilling operations caused a private nuisance by:

a) Creating annoyance and inconvenience to Plaintiffs; or,

b) Using more land than reasonably necessary for a longer time than reasonably necessary;

c) And, the amount of damages, if any, resulting therefrom, not to exceed $25,000, the amount sued for.

3. Should you find…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hartshorn v. . ChaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Mozzetti v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Burr v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Rabe v. Shoenberger Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Curtis v. Fruin-Colnon Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API