Briscoe v. Harper Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentSummers, Justice
The instructions contained a preliminary-statement of the issues as follows:
“1. The amount of damages to Plaintiffs’ growing crops, including grasses, resulting from Defendant’s drilling operations, not to exceed $2,000, the amount sued for.
2. Whether or not the Defendant’s drilling operations caused a private nuisance by:
a) Creating annoyance and inconvenience to Plaintiffs; or,
b) Using more land than reasonably necessary for a longer time than reasonably necessary;
c) And, the amount of damages, if any, resulting therefrom, not to exceed $25,000, the amount sued for.
3. Should you find…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hartshorn v. . ChaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Mozzetti v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Burr v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Rabe v. Shoenberger Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Curtis v. Fruin-Colnon Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.