Legal Opinion

State v. Rooks

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 30, 1980PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the State, under 10 Del.C. § 9902, which is before us for the second time. The central issue in the appeal involves a ruling by a Trial Judge in the Superior Court that statements made by a prospective State witness were inadmissible in a prosecution for first-degree murder. See 11 Del.C. § 3507. After ruling on distinctions between the judge-jury issue of voluntariness and the jury issue of reliability, we remanded the case to the Superior Court for reconsideration of its order on the evidence issue. Reference is made to our prior opinion for a full statement of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RooksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. State v. WinsettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1968
  3. Winsett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  2. George L. Reynolds v. Jack C. Ellingsworth, Warden and Charles M. Oberly, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Roth v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. George L. Reynolds v. Jack C. Ellingsworth, Warden Charles M. Oberly, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. George L. Reynolds v. Jack C. Ellingsworth, Warden Charles M. Oberly, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API