Legal Opinion

Winsett v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 29, 1968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

These appellants, Thomas H. Winsett, Wilbert A. Weekley and Edward J. Mayerhofer, were denied relief which they sought in Superior Court in a Huntley hearing * under Criminal Rule 35 of that Court, Del.C.Ann. They have appealed from that ruling. The opinion of the lower Court is reported in Del.Super., 238 A.2d 821. See also Del.Super., 230 A.2d 777; Del., 222 A.2d 781; Del., 205 A.2d 510. After reviewing the briefs and the record, we find no reversible error.

Specifically:

1) We approve the rules of law stated by the Trial Court as follows:

“The use of reasonable force in effecting an arrest…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  5. State v. WinsettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Whalen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. State v. RooksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. State v. OakesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  4. State v. HamiltonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1985
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Thomas Hoyt Winsett v. Raymond W. Anderson, Warden, New Castle Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API