Legal Opinion

George L. Reynolds v. Jack C. Ellingsworth, Warden and Charles M. Oberly, III

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 24, 1988No. 86-5633PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This appeal centers on the district court’s determination that a procedural default in the state courts barred review of the merits of two claims raised in a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging a state conviction. 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1982). Petitioner asserts that the prosecutor’s extensive references in his opening statement to two confessions that were never introduced into evidence, and the failure of the trial court to give a curative instruction, denied him due process. We hold that there exists no “independent and…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Kevin Winston Osborn v. Duane Shillinger, Warden of the Wyoming State Penitentiary A.G. McClintock the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Gary Lee Doctor v. Gilbert A. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. Szuchon v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  4. Campbell v. BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Bond v. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API