Legal Opinion

George L. Reynolds v. Jack C. Ellingsworth, Warden Charles M. Oberly, III

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 2, 1994No. 93-7106PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to consider the situation of a criminal defendant whose lawyers make a tactical decision not to raise federal due process objections in the defendant’s state trial or on state direct appeal, and do so under circumstances in which they could have a good faith expectation that the defendant would be able to raise these federal objections in state collateral review proceedings. The issue we address is whether the rule of Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963), bars such a defendant from later raising his…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Great Point Intermodal, LLC v. Norfolk Southern Corp. (In Re Great Point Intermodal, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Beasley v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. (HC) Caldwell v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Burton v. McVayDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
  5. Camenisch v. Umpqua BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API