Legal Opinion

Carl v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1984No. Appeal, No. 106 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barbieri,

Claimant in this workmen’s ¡compensation ease, Annabelle E. Carl, ¡appeals here from ,an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board disallowing compensation on the basis of findings ,by a compensation .referee. We will ¡reverse and remand.

The uneontradioted testimony in .this ease establishes that Claimant, a ¡computer operator, ¡suffered the rupture of a cerebral aneurysm as a result of physical exertion while pushing the oar of a fellow employee in ¡the snow .on January 20, 1978. She has not returned to work since, ¡and the employer has hired another to take…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Fashion Hosiery Shops v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Nilsson v. Nepi Brothers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Butrin v. Manion Steel Barrel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Schofield v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dana Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Markle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Bucknell University)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Williams v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Markle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Bucknell University)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Ortt v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API