Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dorwart v. Caraway

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2002No. 01-199Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Nelson

specially concurs.

¶79 I concur in our Opinion. Before discussing the substance of my special concurrence, however, I am compelled to address Chief Justice Gray’s contention that our Opinion-and presumably my special concurrence-violate the “law of the case” doctrine as regards our discussion and holding on due process. I agree that the law of the case doctrine is an important rule; it is axiomatic that we have applied it many times. Notwithstanding, this doctrine is not applicable in the present situation given the posture of this case vis-a-vis Dorwart I. First the law.

¶80 In her dissent,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API