Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 20, 2018No. A162347PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAoyagi, J.

*518Defendant was convicted of two counts of theft in the first degree and ordered to pay $4,442.23 in restitution. On appeal, he raises four assignments of error, each of which challenges a portion of the restitution award. With respect to the second and third assignments of error, we agree with the state that defendant invited or waived any objection to the alleged errors and therefore reject those assignments without further discussion. Regarding the first and fourth assignments of error, we agree with defendant that the trial court erred. Accordingly, we remand for resentencing.

Defendant and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. SteenOregon Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LobueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. Reyes-CastroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. SidenerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API