Legal Opinion

Clouston v. Remlinger Oldsmobile Cadillac, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1970No. 69-95PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.

This case presents a simple question which may be stated as follows:

In Ohio, does a wife have a cause of action for damages for the loss of the consortium of her husband against a person who negligently injures her husband, which injuries deprive her of the consortium of her husband?

In this case, the plaintiff alleges in her petition that the defendant-appellant was negligent and that as a result of such negligence her husband was severely and permanently disabled. This action by the plaintiff is not for the pain and suffering and permanent disability of her husband, but is to recover damages…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. American Export Lines, Inc. v. AlvezSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Gates v. FoleySupreme Court of Florida · 1971

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API