Legal Opinion
Crone v. City of El Cajon
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 8, 1933No. Docket No. 946PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict entered after the jury had returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for damages caused by the drowning of his fourteen year old son in a municipally owned swimming pool. Motions for nonsuit and an instructed verdict were regularly made by defendants.
The allegations of the pleadings before us show that the action as originally brought included the members of the city council of the City of El Cajon as defendants and sought to recover judgment against them under the provisions of section 1 of an act of the legislature approved June…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Kellar v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Pittam v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Brotherton v. Manhattan Beach Improvement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Polk v. Laurel Hill Cemetery Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hoggard v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Mayor of Baltimore v. State Ex Rel. BluefordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Evansville v. BlueIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
- Plaza v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.