Legal Opinion

Lumarose Equipment Corp. v. City of Springfield

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 28, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This action in the Superior Court arises out of the city’s use in its sanitary landfill during the period September 15, 1971, through March 31, 1977, of certain items of heavy equipment which were owned by the plaintiff and suited to the spreading and compaction of refuse. By its complaint the plaintiff sought damages arising out of the city’s alleged failures to maintain the equipment in satisfactory condition, as well as amounts claimed to be due for *518the use of the equipment. By its counterclaim the city sought (among other things) recovery of various amounts claimed to have been paid to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Singarella v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. United States v. BurchardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Adalian Bros. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States Leasing Corp. v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Park Drive Towing, Inc. v. City of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Bradston Associates, LLC v. Suffolk County Sheriff's DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Gans Tire Sales Co. v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Park Drive Towing, Inc. v. City of RevereMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API