Legal Opinion

Bradston Associates, LLC v. Suffolk County Sheriff's Department

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 26, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

On further appellate review, we must decide whether the failure of the auditor of the city of Boston to certify that an adequate appropriation was available to fund a lease contract entered into between Bradston Associates, LLC (Bradston), and the sheriff of Suffolk County, which was in all other respects properly executed and funded, is a sufficient ground on which *276to invalidate the contract. We conclude that it is not and set aside summary judgment that was entered for the sheriff.

Facts. From the summary judgment record, we glean the following undisputed facts. On August 13, 2001, after a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. LeavittSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Singarella v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. City of Lawrence v. FalzaranoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Boston Teachers Union v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Adalian Bros. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. INTERNATIONAL SALT CO., LLC v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Morton Street LLC v. Sheriff of Suffolk CountyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Fargo Management, LLC v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Superior Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API