Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Caudle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1943No. 30726PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted by Sue Caudle, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the City of Tulsa, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover damages sustained to her person as the result of a fall into a water meter box alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence in knowingly using a cover with a broken lock on said meter box. The answer of defendant was a general denial and plea of contributory negligence. Trial was had to a jury. Demurrer to evidence of plaintiff and motion of defendant for directed verdict at the close of the evidence were overruled. Defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. City of Tulsa v. FryeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Mascho v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Bellevue Gas & Oil Co. v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Norman v. SalleeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Richards v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. The Town of Antlers, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation v. Harold BensonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  4. King v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API