Legal Opinion

Sloan v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2011No. 20100385PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Claud Sloan appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Workforce Safety & Insurance (“WSI”) order awarding him additional permanent impairment benefits. We affirm, concluding WSI’s promulgation of administrative rules for assessing pain impairment does not conflict with its statutory authority and was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable.

I

[¶ 2] In December 1985, Sloan sustained a compensable work-related injury while employed at a coal gasification plant in Beulah, North Dakota. WSI awarded Sloan permanent impairment benefits for his injury and has issued…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Moore v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Little v. TracyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Workforce Safety & Insurance v. AuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Shiek v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Bishop v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. EstradaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Walstad v. WalstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API