Little v. Tracy
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
In a review of rulemaking, we consider whether a new agency regulation on arbitration of an employee’s claim exceeds the authority of the Workers’ Compensation Bureau. The statute authorizes an employee-claimant to elect decision by arbitrators rather than by a Bureau official, but the regulation gives the employer the power to refuse the employee’s election. We hold that, because it exceeds the scope of the statute, the regulation is invalid.
The 1991 North Dakota Legislature enacted a “hoghouse” bill changing much workers’ compensation law. One of 77 new sections enacted…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hawkins v. BleaklySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Selzler v. SelzlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Public Service Commission v. Wimbledon Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Nelson v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Estate of Christeson v. GilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. FelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.