Haack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Special Judge.
This is an action brought by Arthur C. Haack, lessor, against The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (hereafter “A & P”), lessee, and H & K Distributors, Inc. (hereafter “H & K”), sublessee, for termination of the lease, for possession of the leased premises, and for monetary damages based on an alleged breach of the lease when A & P subleased the premises without the consent of the owner-lessor. A & P filed various counterclaims and a motion for summary judgment. The trial court severed plaintiff’s action from the counterclaims, denied A & P’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Lippman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Hoffman Wall Paper Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Broad & Branford Place Corp. v. J. J. Hockenjos Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Funk v. FunkIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Rietsch v. TWH Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Worcester-Tatnuck Square CVS, Inc. v. KaplanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- B.M.B. Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. McMahan Valley Stores and Sussex Group, Ltd., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.