Legal Opinion

Funk v. Funk

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1981No. 13310PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment which denied the relief sought by plaintiff-lessors, f. e., the termination of a farm lease. We affirm.

The principal question presented is the ability of a lessee to sublease without the consent of the lessor when the lease allows subletting conditioned on the lessor’s consent and the lessor arbitrarily and capriciously withholds such consent.

In November of 1969, plaintiff-appellants Ewald and Pearl Funk [hereinafter lessors] leased certain farm land to Melvin and Diane Funk [hereinafter lessees] for a ten year period commencing…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Food Pantry, Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dress Shirt Sales, Inc. v. Hotel Martinique AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Homa-Goff Interiors, Inc. v. CowdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Arrington v. Walter E. Heller International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. LePelley v. GrefensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Dick Broadcasting Company, Inc. of Tennessee v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wing v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Julian v. ChristopherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Triangle Mining Co., Inc., and Terteling Land Company v. Stauffer Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API