Legal Opinion
Stenlund v. Marriott International, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 22, 2016No. Case No.: GJH-14-1544PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GEORGE J. HAZEL, United States District Judge
In this slip-and-fall negligence action, Plaintiff Paula Stenlund seeks to recover damages for injuries she sustained while she was a guest at the Panama City Marriott Hotel in Panama City, Panama (the “Hotel”). After Defendant Marriott International, Inc. (“Marriott International” or “Defendant”) answered the Complaint. ECF No. 8, this Court issued a scheduling order allowing for bifurcated discovery. ECF No. 12. Phase I of discovery was limited to issues regarding the relationship between Marriott International and non-party…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pearson v. Component Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Dyer v. Maryland State Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- United States ex rel. Vitale v. Mimedx Grp., Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- Mary DiFederico v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Adewol v. TGINESIS LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Adeyemi v. GarlandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.