Legal Opinion

Bullard v. Pilot Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

In the first fourteen exceptions the defendants assign as error the admission of evidence tending to show the value at which several witnesses estimated the stock of goods a short time before the fire, the contention being that the records showing purchases, sales, and shipments cannot be supplied in this way.

The clauses referred to are as follows:

“1. The assured will take a complete itemized inventory of stock on hand at least once in each calendar year and, unless such inventory has been taken within 12 calendar months prior to the date of this policy, one shall be taken in detail within 30…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grabbs v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Horton v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Johnson v. Rhode Island InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Grubbs v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. McLaurin v. . CronlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Midkiff v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Aldridge v. Greensboro Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Foscue v. Greensboro Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Greene v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Zibelin v. Pawtucket Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API