Legal Opinion
Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 2, 2003No. AC 23896PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
This case concerns a premises liability insurance policy.1 The issue is whether the policy provides coverage for personal injuiy litigation arising out of a negligent use of the premises that is not linked to a defective condition in the premises themselves. The injured person was a child who was bitten on the premises by a dog that was owned and kept by the owner of the business and the premises. The trial court concluded that the owner did not have insurance coverage because the owner did not keep the dog on the premises for the purpose of protecting the premises.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Schilberg Integrated Metals Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- LaFlamme v. DallessioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Flint v. Universal Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Hogle v. HogleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Kent School Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004