Legal Opinion

Chicago Title Insurance v. Kent School Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 17, 2005No. CIV.A.3:02 CV 1095(C)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DRONEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Chicago Title Insurance Company (“Chicago Title”) brought this action seeking declaratory relief against its insured, the Kent School Corporation (“Kent School”), concerning a title insurance policy. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Chicago Title’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. #29] is DENIED and Kent School’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. # 38] is GRANTED.

I Facts 1

In 1966, Chicago Title issued a policy of title insurance to Kent School, an independent boarding…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John D. Flowers and Dave Flowers v. Max Specialty Insurance Company and Darin I. Drane v. Max Specialty Insurance CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Civello v. Equinix, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. John D. Flowers and Dave Flowers v. Max Specialty Insurance Company and Darin I. Drane v. Max Specialty Insurance CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API