Legal Opinion

Nieman v. Wintker

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ op Error to the Circuit Court of Washington county; the Hon. Amos Watts, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

This was assumpsit, by plaintiff in error against defendants in error, on three promissory notes. Suit was brought to the April term, 1876, of the court, and, at that term, non assumpsit and two special pleas, concluding to the country, were pleaded; after which, by agreement of parties, the cause was continued. At the next term, the cause was continued on motion of plaintiff in error. At the next term, being the April term, 1877, on Wednesday, the third day of the term, the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution.

It is claimed the court erred in dismissing the suit for the want of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stumps v. KelleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Gillespie v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Seavey v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. McCully v. SilverburghIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. PattyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  2. Williams v. PearsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  3. Stare v. VaydaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  4. Chicago G. W. Ry. Co. v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
  5. Hansberry v. HollowayIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API