Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 23, 2012No. 20100947-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

ROTH, Judge:

T1 Michelle Ann Cox appeals from her convictions for forgery and theft by deception on the basis that Jury Instruction 33 unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof for an element of each of the crimes to the defense. She also asserts that the theft by deception conviction should have been sentenced as a class B misdemeanor rather than as a class A misdemeanor. We affirm the convictions but remand for resentencing on the theft by deception offense.

12 Cox did not preserve the jury instruction issue in the trial court, and therefore she challenges it under the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BondUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. HummelUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. State v. BruunCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  5. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API